Why did Green have to deal with Whyte

at all?

Thought i'd make my first post a good one.

Because, initially, whyte still owned the majority of shares...

Much the same as at Dunfermline anyone wanting to buy them would have had to deal with Masterton...

Not the case now tho as he's handed his shares over...

Still owns the ground...

Pretty sure this is leading to something else tho......

Teejay does like to drip-feed us

It was the administrators that were looking for a buyer, not Whyte. Whyte had no way to veto or stop the administrators selling to whoever they chose. The club going into administration took it out of Whyte's hands. That's what administration is.

Whyte had to agree to hand over his shares.

What would have happened had he not agreed?

The administrators run things and make decisions...

They don't own anything tho...

Tokin Jester wrote:What would have happened had he not agreed?

i don't know that he did agree - the business was put into liquidation so at that point share ownership becomes irrelevant i.e. you've lost them